Stock comparison
ACM Research
Cadence Design Systems
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
ACMR
ACM Research
Market cap
$4.7B
Sector
Technology
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | ACMR | CDNS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 49D | 78B | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 79B | 84A | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 54C | 84A | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 66B | 78B | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 43D | 58C | CDNS |
| Charlie Munger | 34F | 80A | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 29F | 80A | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ACMR | CDNS |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $4.7B | $103.04B |
| P/E (TTM) | 46.8x | 80.7x |
| EV/EBIT | 34.0x | 59.1x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 4.39% | 12.19% |
| Gross margin | 44.23% | 88.85% |
| Net margin | 9.48% | 21.18% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 36.48% | 15.38% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 22.63% | 12.65% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.2x | 0.5x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
ACMR leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y36.48%vs 15.38%+58%
- Debt / Equity0.2xvs 0.5x+55%
- EPS CAGR 5y22.63%vs 12.65%+44%
- EV/EBIT34.0xvs 59.1x+42%
CDNS leads on
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $4.7B+95%
- ROIC (TTM)12.19%vs 4.39%+64%
- Net margin21.18%vs 9.48%+55%
- Gross margin88.85%vs 44.23%+50%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.