Stock comparison
Abercrombie & Fitch
Winmark
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch
Market cap
$3.47B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
WINA
Winmark
Market cap
$1.31B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
Overall winner
Winmark WINA
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | ANF | WINA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 59C | 80A | WINA |
| Benjamin Graham | 59C | 77B | WINA |
| Philip Fisher | 59C | 66B | WINA |
| Peter Lynch | 49D | 64C | WINA |
| Joel Greenblatt | 43D | 69B | WINA |
| Charlie Munger | 55C | 57C | WINA |
| Terry Smith | 51C | 58C | WINA |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ANF | WINA |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $3.47B | $1.31B |
| P/E (TTM) | 6.5x | 31.6x |
| EV/EBIT | 5.2x | 24.5x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 18.86% | 2.43% |
| Gross margin | 58.61% | 96.66% |
| Net margin | 9.63% | 48.19% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 9.13% | 2.42% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 24.84% | 1.92% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.8x | - |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 3.84% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
ANF leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y24.84%vs 1.92%+92%
- P/E (TTM)6.5xvs 31.6x+79%
- EV/EBIT5.2xvs 24.5x+79%
- Revenue CAGR 5y9.13%vs 2.42%+74%
WINA leads on
- Debt / Equity-vs 0.8x+162%
- Dividend yield3.84%vs 0.0%+100%
- ROIC (TTM)2.43%vs 18.86%+92%
- Net margin48.19%vs 9.63%+80%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.