Stock comparison
Barrick Mining
Gold Fields Limited
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
B
Barrick Mining
Market cap
$68B
Sector
Materials
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
Market cap
$36.64B
Sector
Materials
Overall winner
Gold Fields Limited GFI
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | B | GFI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 46D | 62C | GFI |
| Benjamin Graham | 57C | 55C | B |
| Philip Fisher | 35D | 68B | GFI |
| Peter Lynch | 25F | 54C | GFI |
| Joel Greenblatt | 27F | 37D | GFI |
| Charlie Munger | 38D | 62C | GFI |
| Terry Smith | 36D | 61C | GFI |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | B | GFI |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $68B | $36.64B |
| P/E (TTM) | 11.2x | 9.8x |
| EV/EBIT | 8.1x | 8.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 16.0% | 24.32% |
| Gross margin | 53.35% | 59.03% |
| Net margin | 32.04% | 40.95% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 9.06% | 20.27% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | -47.87% | 44.4% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.2x | 0.4x |
| Dividend yield | 2.08% | 4.46% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
B leads on
- Debt / Equity0.2xvs 0.4x+60%
- Market cap$68Bvs $36.64B+46%
- EV/EBIT8.1xvs 8.8x+8%
GFI leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y44.4%vs -47.87%+193%
- Revenue CAGR 5y20.27%vs 9.06%+55%
- Dividend yield4.46%vs 2.08%+53%
- ROIC (TTM)24.32%vs 16.0%+34%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.