Stock comparison
BHP Group Limited
CF Industries Holdings
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
BHP
BHP Group Limited
Market cap
$215.47B
Sector
Materials
CF
CF Industries Holdings
Market cap
$18.7B
Sector
Materials
Overall winner
CF Industries Holdings CF
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | BHP | CF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 67B | 64C | BHP |
| Benjamin Graham | 72B | 72B | Tie |
| Philip Fisher | 56D | 60C | CF |
| Peter Lynch | 28F | 42D | CF |
| Joel Greenblatt | 35D | 35D | Tie |
| Charlie Munger | 73B | 66C | BHP |
| Terry Smith | 68C | 69B | CF |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | BHP | CF |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $215.47B | $18.7B |
| P/E (TTM) | 20.7x | 10.9x |
| EV/EBIT | 11.9x | 8.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 13.26% | 15.41% |
| Gross margin | 82.71% | 40.41% |
| Net margin | 18.98% | 23.73% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | -2.73% | 2.03% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | -6.0% | 20.46% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.6x | 0.7x |
| Dividend yield | 3.31% | 1.61% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
BHP leads on
- Market cap$215.47Bvs $18.7B+91%
- Dividend yield3.31%vs 1.61%+51%
- Gross margin82.71%vs 40.41%+51%
- Debt / Equity0.6xvs 0.7x+8%
CF leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y2.03%vs -2.73%+174%
- EPS CAGR 5y20.46%vs -6.0%+129%
- P/E (TTM)10.9xvs 20.7x+47%
- EV/EBIT8.8xvs 11.9x+27%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.