Stock comparison
Black Stone Minerals, L.P.
RPC
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
BSM
Black Stone Minerals, L.P.
Market cap
$2.84B
Sector
Energy
RES
RPC
Market cap
$1.56B
Sector
Energy
Overall winner
Black Stone Minerals, L.P. BSM
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | BSM | RES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 66B | 45D | BSM |
| Benjamin Graham | 54C | 65B | RES |
| Philip Fisher | 58C | 56C | BSM |
| Peter Lynch | 27F | 59C | RES |
| Joel Greenblatt | 45D | 34F | BSM |
| Charlie Munger | 73B | 32F | BSM |
| Terry Smith | 74B | 41D | BSM |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | BSM | RES |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $2.84B | $1.56B |
| P/E (TTM) | 9.6x | 74.3x |
| EV/EBIT | 11.6x | 25.2x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 27.66% | 1.95% |
| Gross margin | 78.01% | 11.43% |
| Net margin | 63.48% | 1.2% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | -4.41% | 17.1% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 13.55% | 45.47% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.2x | 0.1x |
| Dividend yield | 8.97% | 2.28% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
BSM leads on
- Net margin63.48%vs 1.2%+98%
- ROIC (TTM)27.66%vs 1.95%+93%
- P/E (TTM)9.6xvs 74.3x+87%
- Gross margin78.01%vs 11.43%+85%
RES leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y17.1%vs -4.41%+126%
- EPS CAGR 5y45.47%vs 13.55%+70%
- Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.2x+61%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.