Stock comparison
Chaince Digital Holdings
Cadence Design Systems
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CD
Chaince Digital Holdings
Market cap
$587.09M
Sector
Technology
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CD | CDNS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 33F | 78B | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 53D | 84A | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 49D | 84A | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 43D | 78B | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 0F | 58C | CDNS |
| Charlie Munger | 33F | 80A | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 32F | 80A | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CD | CDNS |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $587.09M | $103.04B |
| P/E (TTM) | - | 80.7x |
| EV/EBIT | - | 59.1x |
| ROIC (TTM) | -8.79% | 12.19% |
| Gross margin | 46.73% | 88.85% |
| Net margin | -2.46% | 21.18% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 29.19% | 15.38% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | - | 12.65% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.0x | 0.5x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CD leads on
- P/E (TTM)-vs 80.7x+177%
- EV/EBIT-vs 59.1x+127%
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.5x+95%
- Revenue CAGR 5y29.19%vs 15.38%+47%
CDNS leads on
- ROIC (TTM)12.19%vs -8.79%+172%
- Net margin21.18%vs -2.46%+109%
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $587.09M+99%
- Gross margin88.85%vs 46.73%+47%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.