Stock comparison
Cadence Design Systems
GLOBALFOUNDRIES
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES
Market cap
$47.65B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CDNS | GFS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 38D | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 64D | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 84A | 54C | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 78B | 38D | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 43D | CDNS |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 39D | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 80A | 41D | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CDNS | GFS |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.04B | $47.65B |
| P/E (TTM) | 80.7x | 50.8x |
| EV/EBIT | 59.1x | 49.6x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.19% | 4.86% |
| Gross margin | 88.85% | 26.4% |
| Net margin | 21.18% | 11.37% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.38% | 0.77% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.65% | 120.12% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 0.1x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CDNS leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y15.38%vs 0.77%+95%
- Gross margin88.85%vs 26.4%+70%
- ROIC (TTM)12.19%vs 4.86%+60%
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $47.65B+54%
GFS leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y120.12%vs 12.65%+89%
- Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.5x+69%
- P/E (TTM)50.8xvs 80.7x+37%
- EV/EBIT49.6xvs 59.1x+16%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.