Stock comparison
Cadence Design Systems
TaskUs
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
TASK
TaskUs
Market cap
$555.72M
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CDNS | TASK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 43D | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 45D | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 84A | 28F | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 78B | 57C | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 31F | CDNS |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 31F | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 80A | 27F | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CDNS | TASK |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.04B | $555.72M |
| P/E (TTM) | 80.7x | 5.0x |
| EV/EBIT | 59.1x | 6.5x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.19% | 12.15% |
| Gross margin | 88.85% | 35.48% |
| Net margin | 21.18% | 8.7% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.38% | 11.68% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.65% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 2.0x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 62.29% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CDNS leads on
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $555.72M+99%
- Debt / Equity0.5xvs 2.0x+76%
- Gross margin88.85%vs 35.48%+60%
- Net margin21.18%vs 8.7%+59%
TASK leads on
- Dividend yield62.29%vs 0.0%+100%
- P/E (TTM)5.0xvs 80.7x+94%
- EV/EBIT6.5xvs 59.1x+89%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.