Stock comparison
Cadence Design Systems
Teradyne
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
TER
Teradyne
Market cap
$56.11B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CDNS | TER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 65B | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 84A | Tie |
| Philip Fisher | 84A | 60D | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 78B | 24F | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 69C | TER |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 78B | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 80A | 70C | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CDNS | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.04B | $56.11B |
| P/E (TTM) | 80.7x | 61.9x |
| EV/EBIT | 59.1x | 76.0x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.19% | 25.66% |
| Gross margin | 88.85% | 58.79% |
| Net margin | 21.18% | 22.55% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.38% | -3.66% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.65% | -13.21% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.15% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CDNS leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y12.65%vs -13.21%+196%
- Revenue CAGR 5y15.38%vs -3.66%+124%
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $56.11B+46%
- Gross margin88.85%vs 58.79%+34%
TER leads on
- Dividend yield0.15%vs 0.0%+100%
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.5x+94%
- ROIC (TTM)25.66%vs 12.19%+52%
- P/E (TTM)61.9xvs 80.7x+23%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.