Stock comparison
Cadence Design Systems
Cellebrite DI
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
CLBT
Cellebrite DI
Market cap
$3.29B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CDNS | CLBT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 48D | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 62D | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 84A | 60C | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 78B | 34F | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 51C | CDNS |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 49D | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 80A | 50D | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CDNS | CLBT |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.04B | $3.29B |
| P/E (TTM) | 80.7x | 44.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 59.1x | 47.7x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.19% | 10.02% |
| Gross margin | 88.85% | 84.2% |
| Net margin | 21.18% | 16.47% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.38% | 17.89% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.65% | -10.56% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CDNS leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y12.65%vs -10.56%+183%
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $3.29B+97%
- Net margin21.18%vs 16.47%+22%
- ROIC (TTM)12.19%vs 10.02%+18%
CLBT leads on
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.5x+90%
- P/E (TTM)44.5xvs 80.7x+45%
- EV/EBIT47.7xvs 59.1x+19%
- Revenue CAGR 5y17.89%vs 15.38%+14%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.