Stock comparison
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
USA Compression Partners, LP
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
Market cap
$103.19B
Sector
Energy
USAC
USA Compression Partners, LP
Market cap
$3.56B
Sector
Energy
Overall winner
USA Compression Partners, LP USAC
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CNQ | USAC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 54C | 69C | USAC |
| Benjamin Graham | 59C | 84A | USAC |
| Philip Fisher | 50C | 61C | USAC |
| Peter Lynch | 44D | 71C | USAC |
| Joel Greenblatt | 43D | 35D | CNQ |
| Charlie Munger | 47D | 68D | USAC |
| Terry Smith | 43D | 64D | USAC |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CNQ | USAC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.19B | $3.56B |
| P/E (TTM) | 14.2x | 32.8x |
| EV/EBIT | 19.1x | 20.6x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 10.46% | 8.89% |
| Gross margin | 31.36% | 51.61% |
| Net margin | 24.51% | 11.91% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 7.68% | 12.07% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.39% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.4x | 9.5x |
| Dividend yield | 3.61% | 7.08% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CNQ leads on
- Market cap$103.19Bvs $3.56B+97%
- Debt / Equity0.4xvs 9.5x+95%
- P/E (TTM)14.2xvs 32.8x+57%
- Net margin24.51%vs 11.91%+51%
USAC leads on
- Dividend yield7.08%vs 3.61%+49%
- Gross margin51.61%vs 31.36%+39%
- Revenue CAGR 5y12.07%vs 7.68%+36%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.