Which is better, DT or KLAC?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, KLA Corporation (KLAC) currently grades higher than DT — 74/100 (B grade) vs 47/100 (D). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — DT wins on Peter Lynch; KLAC wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy DT or KLAC?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both DT and KLAC are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is DT better than KLAC for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, KLAC currently grades higher — 74/100 vs 47/100, a 27-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between DT and KLAC on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). DT currently scores 47/100 (D grade); KLAC scores 74/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, DT or KLAC?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. DT and KLAC are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, DT or KLAC?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are DT and KLAC both Technology stocks?

Yes — both Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and KLA Corporation (KLAC) operate in the Technology sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this DT vs KLAC comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Dynatrace

KLA

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Dynatrace

Market cap

$11.44B

Sector

Technology

KLAC

KLA

Market cap

$235.69B

Sector

Technology

Overall winner

KLA KLAC

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	DT	KLAC	Winner
Warren Buffett	47D	74B	KLAC
Benjamin Graham	71B	86A	KLAC
Philip Fisher	74B	82A	KLAC
Peter Lynch	72B	69B	DT
Joel Greenblatt	42D	70B	KLAC
Charlie Munger	41D	85A	KLAC
Terry Smith	48D	86A	KLAC

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	DT	KLAC
Market cap	$11.44B	$235.69B
P/E (TTM)	70.2x	50.6x
EV/EBIT	39.8x	45.8x
ROIC (TTM)	4.99%	36.29%
Gross margin	81.56%	61.75%
Net margin	8.06%	35.66%
Revenue CAGR 5y	21.39%	15.13%
EPS CAGR 5y	31.61%	22.65%
Debt / Equity	0.1x	1.1x
Dividend yield	0.0%	0.42%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

DT leads on

Debt / Equity0.1xvs 1.1x+94%
Revenue CAGR 5y21.39%vs 15.13%+29%
EPS CAGR 5y31.61%vs 22.65%+28%
Gross margin81.56%vs 61.75%+24%

KLAC leads on

Dividend yield0.42%vs 0.0%+100%
Market cap$235.69Bvs $11.44B+95%
ROIC (TTM)36.29%vs 4.99%+86%
Net margin35.66%vs 8.06%+77%

More like DT

DT vs FICO DT vs FTNT DT vs CDNS DT vs NP DT vs 6920.T DT vs APP

More like KLAC

KLAC vs FICO KLAC vs FTNT KLAC vs CDNS KLAC vs NP KLAC vs 6920.T KLAC vs APP

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for DT Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for KLAC

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Dynatrace

KLA

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Dynatrace

Market cap

$11.44B

Sector

Technology

KLAC

KLA

Market cap

$235.69B

Sector

Technology

Overall winner

KLA KLAC

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	DT	KLAC	Winner
Warren Buffett	47D	74B	KLAC
Benjamin Graham	71B	86A	KLAC
Philip Fisher	74B	82A	KLAC
Peter Lynch	72B	69B	DT
Joel Greenblatt	42D	70B	KLAC
Charlie Munger	41D	85A	KLAC
Terry Smith	48D	86A	KLAC

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	DT	KLAC
Market cap	$11.44B	$235.69B
P/E (TTM)	70.2x	50.6x
EV/EBIT	39.8x	45.8x
ROIC (TTM)	4.99%	36.29%
Gross margin	81.56%	61.75%
Net margin	8.06%	35.66%
Revenue CAGR 5y	21.39%	15.13%
EPS CAGR 5y	31.61%	22.65%
Debt / Equity	0.1x	1.1x
Dividend yield	0.0%	0.42%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

DT leads on

Debt / Equity0.1xvs 1.1x+94%
Revenue CAGR 5y21.39%vs 15.13%+29%
EPS CAGR 5y31.61%vs 22.65%+28%
Gross margin81.56%vs 61.75%+24%

KLAC leads on

Dividend yield0.42%vs 0.0%+100%
Market cap$235.69Bvs $11.44B+95%
ROIC (TTM)36.29%vs 4.99%+86%
Net margin35.66%vs 8.06%+77%

More like DT

DT vs FICO DT vs FTNT DT vs CDNS DT vs NP DT vs 6920.T DT vs APP

More like KLAC

KLAC vs FICO KLAC vs FTNT KLAC vs CDNS KLAC vs NP KLAC vs 6920.T KLAC vs APP

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for DT Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for KLAC

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.