Which is better, EAT or RACE?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Ferrari N.V. (RACE) currently grades higher than EAT — 69/100 (B grade) vs 57/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — EAT wins on none; RACE wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy EAT or RACE?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both EAT and RACE are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is EAT better than RACE for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, RACE currently grades higher — 69/100 vs 57/100, a 12-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between EAT and RACE on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). EAT currently scores 57/100 (C grade); RACE scores 69/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, EAT or RACE?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. EAT and RACE are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, EAT or RACE?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are EAT and RACE both Consumer Cyclical stocks?

Yes — both Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Ferrari N.V. (RACE) operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this EAT vs RACE comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Brinker International

Ferrari N.V.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

EAT

Market cap

$5.99B

Sector

Consumer Discretionary

RACE

Ferrari N.V.

Market cap

$56.95B

Sector

Consumer Discretionary

Overall winner

Ferrari N.V. RACE

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	EAT	RACE	Winner
Warren Buffett	57C	69B	RACE
Benjamin Graham	62C	74B	RACE
Philip Fisher	50C	67B	RACE
Peter Lynch	53C	55C	RACE
Joel Greenblatt	42D	46D	RACE
Charlie Munger	49D	69B	RACE
Terry Smith	50C	69B	RACE

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	EAT	RACE
Market cap	$5.99B	$56.95B
P/E (TTM)	13.0x	30.7x
EV/EBIT	15.0x	23.7x
ROIC (TTM)	22.35%	18.26%
Gross margin	46.04%	51.61%
Net margin	8.07%	22.2%
Revenue CAGR 5y	12.7%	13.73%
EPS CAGR 5y	31.3%	18.82%
Debt / Equity	4.3x	0.7x
Dividend yield	0.0%	1.3%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

EAT leads on

P/E (TTM)13.0xvs 30.7x+58%
EPS CAGR 5y31.3%vs 18.82%+40%
EV/EBIT15.0xvs 23.7x+37%
ROIC (TTM)22.35%vs 18.26%+18%

RACE leads on

Dividend yield1.3%vs 0.0%+100%
Market cap$56.95Bvs $5.99B+89%
Debt / Equity0.7xvs 4.3x+83%
Net margin22.2%vs 8.07%+64%

More like EAT

EAT vs GAW.L EAT vs WINA EAT vs BKNG EAT vs 3092.T EAT vs ATAT EAT vs 9983.T

More like RACE

RACE vs GAW.L RACE vs WINA RACE vs BKNG RACE vs 3092.T RACE vs ATAT RACE vs 9983.T

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for EAT Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for RACE

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Brinker International

Ferrari N.V.

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

EAT

Brinker International

Market cap

$5.99B

Sector

Consumer Discretionary

RACE

Ferrari N.V.

Market cap

$56.95B

Sector

Consumer Discretionary

Overall winner

Ferrari N.V. RACE

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	EAT	RACE	Winner
Warren Buffett	57C	69B	RACE
Benjamin Graham	62C	74B	RACE
Philip Fisher	50C	67B	RACE
Peter Lynch	53C	55C	RACE
Joel Greenblatt	42D	46D	RACE
Charlie Munger	49D	69B	RACE
Terry Smith	50C	69B	RACE

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	EAT	RACE
Market cap	$5.99B	$56.95B
P/E (TTM)	13.0x	30.7x
EV/EBIT	15.0x	23.7x
ROIC (TTM)	22.35%	18.26%
Gross margin	46.04%	51.61%
Net margin	8.07%	22.2%
Revenue CAGR 5y	12.7%	13.73%
EPS CAGR 5y	31.3%	18.82%
Debt / Equity	4.3x	0.7x
Dividend yield	0.0%	1.3%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

EAT leads on

P/E (TTM)13.0xvs 30.7x+58%
EPS CAGR 5y31.3%vs 18.82%+40%
EV/EBIT15.0xvs 23.7x+37%
ROIC (TTM)22.35%vs 18.26%+18%

RACE leads on

Dividend yield1.3%vs 0.0%+100%
Market cap$56.95Bvs $5.99B+89%
Debt / Equity0.7xvs 4.3x+83%
Net margin22.2%vs 8.07%+64%

More like EAT

EAT vs GAW.L EAT vs WINA EAT vs BKNG EAT vs 3092.T EAT vs ATAT EAT vs 9983.T

More like RACE

RACE vs GAW.L RACE vs WINA RACE vs BKNG RACE vs 3092.T RACE vs ATAT RACE vs 9983.T

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for EAT Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for RACE

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.