Stock comparison
Cadence Design Systems
Everforth
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
EFOR
Everforth
Market cap
$799.5M
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CDNS | EFOR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 39D | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 33F | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 84A | 14F | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 78B | 8F | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 21F | CDNS |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 25F | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 80A | 31F | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CDNS | EFOR |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.04B | $799.5M |
| P/E (TTM) | 80.7x | 7.6x |
| EV/EBIT | 59.1x | 6.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.19% | 4.99% |
| Gross margin | 88.85% | 27.72% |
| Net margin | 21.18% | 2.46% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.38% | -0.18% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.65% | -12.16% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 0.6x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CDNS leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y12.65%vs -12.16%+196%
- Revenue CAGR 5y15.38%vs -0.18%+101%
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $799.5M+99%
- Net margin21.18%vs 2.46%+88%
EFOR leads on
- P/E (TTM)7.6xvs 80.7x+91%
- EV/EBIT6.8xvs 59.1x+88%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.