Stock comparison
EQT
USA Compression Partners, LP
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
EQT
EQT
Market cap
$36.23B
Sector
Energy
USAC
USA Compression Partners, LP
Market cap
$3.51B
Sector
Energy
Overall winner
USA Compression Partners, LP USAC
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | EQT | USAC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 54C | 69C | USAC |
| Benjamin Graham | 23F | 84A | USAC |
| Philip Fisher | 68C | 61C | EQT |
| Peter Lynch | 41D | 71C | USAC |
| Joel Greenblatt | 35D | 35D | Tie |
| Charlie Munger | 51D | 68D | USAC |
| Terry Smith | 55D | 64D | USAC |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | EQT | USAC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $36.23B | $3.51B |
| P/E (TTM) | 10.5x | 32.8x |
| EV/EBIT | 12.9x | 20.6x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 9.18% | 8.89% |
| Gross margin | 64.05% | 51.61% |
| Net margin | 33.4% | 11.91% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 7.32% | 12.07% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 19.24% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.2x | 9.5x |
| Dividend yield | 1.16% | 7.08% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
EQT leads on
- Debt / Equity0.2xvs 9.5x+98%
- Market cap$36.23Bvs $3.51B+90%
- P/E (TTM)10.5xvs 32.8x+68%
- Net margin33.4%vs 11.91%+64%
USAC leads on
- Dividend yield7.08%vs 1.16%+84%
- Revenue CAGR 5y12.07%vs 7.32%+39%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.