Stock comparison
Energy Transfer LP
USA Compression Partners, LP
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
ET
Energy Transfer LP
Market cap
$69.06B
Sector
Energy
USAC
USA Compression Partners, LP
Market cap
$3.51B
Sector
Energy
Overall winner
USA Compression Partners, LP USAC
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | ET | USAC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 42D | 69C | USAC |
| Benjamin Graham | 52C | 84A | USAC |
| Philip Fisher | 24F | 61C | USAC |
| Peter Lynch | 22F | 71C | USAC |
| Joel Greenblatt | 27F | 35D | USAC |
| Charlie Munger | 33F | 68D | USAC |
| Terry Smith | 23F | 64D | USAC |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ET | USAC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $69.06B | $3.51B |
| P/E (TTM) | 14.4x | 32.8x |
| EV/EBIT | 14.8x | 20.6x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 7.35% | 8.89% |
| Gross margin | 22.91% | 51.61% |
| Net margin | 5.41% | 11.91% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.22% | 12.07% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | -7.9% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 2.1x | 9.5x |
| Dividend yield | 6.63% | 7.08% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
ET leads on
- Market cap$69.06Bvs $3.51B+95%
- Debt / Equity2.1xvs 9.5x+78%
- P/E (TTM)14.4xvs 32.8x+56%
- EV/EBIT14.8xvs 20.6x+28%
USAC leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y12.07%vs 5.22%+57%
- Gross margin51.61%vs 22.91%+56%
- Net margin11.91%vs 5.41%+55%
- ROIC (TTM)8.89%vs 7.35%+17%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.