Which is better, EXEL or LMAT?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) currently grades higher than EXEL — 77/100 (B grade) vs 64/100 (C). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — EXEL wins on Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; LMAT wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, and Peter Lynch. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy EXEL or LMAT?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both EXEL and LMAT are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is EXEL better than LMAT for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, LMAT currently grades higher — 77/100 vs 64/100, a 13-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between EXEL and LMAT on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). EXEL currently scores 64/100 (C grade); LMAT scores 77/100 (B grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, EXEL or LMAT?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. EXEL and LMAT are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, EXEL or LMAT?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are EXEL and LMAT both Healthcare stocks?

Yes — both Exelixis, Inc. (EXEL) and LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) operate in the Healthcare sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this EXEL vs LMAT comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Exelixis

LeMaitre Vascular

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

EXEL

Exelixis

Market cap

$12.61B

Sector

Healthcare

LMAT

LeMaitre Vascular

Market cap

$2.23B

Sector

Healthcare

Overall winner

LeMaitre Vascular LMAT

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	EXEL	LMAT	Winner
Warren Buffett	64C	77B	LMAT
Benjamin Graham	74B	89A	LMAT
Philip Fisher	74B	81C	LMAT
Peter Lynch	58C	67B	LMAT
Joel Greenblatt	60C	56D	EXEL
Charlie Munger	71B	68D	EXEL
Terry Smith	80A	69D	EXEL

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	EXEL	LMAT
Market cap	$12.61B	$2.23B
P/E (TTM)	15.3x	37.1x
EV/EBIT	14.2x	36.6x
ROIC (TTM)	35.01%	9.43%
Gross margin	96.44%	72.39%
Net margin	35.08%	24.35%
Revenue CAGR 5y	12.76%	12.75%
EPS CAGR 5y	40.93%	19.04%
Debt / Equity	0.1x	0.5x
Dividend yield	0.0%	0.84%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

EXEL leads on

Market cap$12.61Bvs $2.23B+82%
Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.5x+81%
ROIC (TTM)35.01%vs 9.43%+73%
EV/EBIT14.2xvs 36.6x+61%

LMAT leads on

Dividend yield0.84%vs 0.0%+100%

More like EXEL

EXEL vs IDXX EXEL vs 7741.T EXEL vs GMAB EXEL vs HALO EXEL vs SUNPHARMA.NS EXEL vs MTD

More like LMAT

LMAT vs IDXX LMAT vs 7741.T LMAT vs GMAB LMAT vs HALO LMAT vs SUNPHARMA.NS LMAT vs MTD

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for EXEL Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for LMAT

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Exelixis

LeMaitre Vascular

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

EXEL

Exelixis

Market cap

$12.61B

Sector

Healthcare

LMAT

LeMaitre Vascular

Market cap

$2.23B

Sector

Healthcare

Overall winner

LeMaitre Vascular LMAT

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	EXEL	LMAT	Winner
Warren Buffett	64C	77B	LMAT
Benjamin Graham	74B	89A	LMAT
Philip Fisher	74B	81C	LMAT
Peter Lynch	58C	67B	LMAT
Joel Greenblatt	60C	56D	EXEL
Charlie Munger	71B	68D	EXEL
Terry Smith	80A	69D	EXEL

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	EXEL	LMAT
Market cap	$12.61B	$2.23B
P/E (TTM)	15.3x	37.1x
EV/EBIT	14.2x	36.6x
ROIC (TTM)	35.01%	9.43%
Gross margin	96.44%	72.39%
Net margin	35.08%	24.35%
Revenue CAGR 5y	12.76%	12.75%
EPS CAGR 5y	40.93%	19.04%
Debt / Equity	0.1x	0.5x
Dividend yield	0.0%	0.84%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

EXEL leads on

Market cap$12.61Bvs $2.23B+82%
Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.5x+81%
ROIC (TTM)35.01%vs 9.43%+73%
EV/EBIT14.2xvs 36.6x+61%

LMAT leads on

Dividend yield0.84%vs 0.0%+100%

More like EXEL

EXEL vs IDXX EXEL vs 7741.T EXEL vs GMAB EXEL vs HALO EXEL vs SUNPHARMA.NS EXEL vs MTD

More like LMAT

LMAT vs IDXX LMAT vs 7741.T LMAT vs GMAB LMAT vs HALO LMAT vs SUNPHARMA.NS LMAT vs MTD

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for EXEL Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for LMAT

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.