Stock comparison
Cadence Design Systems
Fidelity National Information Services
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services
Market cap
$22.51B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CDNS | FIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 41D | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 20F | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 84A | 27F | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 78B | 52C | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 35D | CDNS |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 24F | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 80A | 26F | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CDNS | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.04B | $22.51B |
| P/E (TTM) | 80.7x | 8.2x |
| EV/EBIT | 59.1x | 14.4x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.19% | 4.8% |
| Gross margin | 88.85% | 37.59% |
| Net margin | 21.18% | 22.91% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.38% | -6.34% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.65% | 2.25% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 0.3x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 3.87% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CDNS leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y15.38%vs -6.34%+141%
- EPS CAGR 5y12.65%vs 2.25%+82%
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $22.51B+78%
- ROIC (TTM)12.19%vs 4.8%+61%
FIS leads on
- Dividend yield3.87%vs 0.0%+100%
- P/E (TTM)8.2xvs 80.7x+90%
- EV/EBIT14.4xvs 59.1x+76%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 0.5x+43%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.