Stock comparison
Cadence Design Systems
Fiserv
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
FISV
Fiserv
Market cap
$30.46B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CDNS | FISV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 56D | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 39D | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 84A | 59C | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 78B | 50C | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 29F | CDNS |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 48D | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 80A | 50D | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CDNS | FISV |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.04B | $30.46B |
| P/E (TTM) | 80.7x | 9.1x |
| EV/EBIT | 59.1x | 10.1x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.19% | 7.31% |
| Gross margin | 88.85% | 58.07% |
| Net margin | 21.18% | 15.17% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.38% | 6.9% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.65% | 33.27% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 1.1x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CDNS leads on
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $30.46B+70%
- Debt / Equity0.5xvs 1.1x+58%
- Revenue CAGR 5y15.38%vs 6.9%+55%
- ROIC (TTM)12.19%vs 7.31%+40%
FISV leads on
- P/E (TTM)9.1xvs 80.7x+89%
- EV/EBIT10.1xvs 59.1x+83%
- EPS CAGR 5y33.27%vs 12.65%+62%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.