Stock comparison
Gold Fields Limited
Idaho Strategic Resources
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
Market cap
$35.38B
Sector
Materials
IDR
Idaho Strategic Resources
Market cap
$573.42M
Sector
Materials
Overall winner
Gold Fields Limited GFI
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | GFI | IDR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 72B | 48D | GFI |
| Benjamin Graham | 65B | 72D | IDR |
| Philip Fisher | 78B | 66C | GFI |
| Peter Lynch | 64C | 78C | IDR |
| Joel Greenblatt | 47D | 57C | IDR |
| Charlie Munger | 72B | 53D | GFI |
| Terry Smith | 71B | 46D | GFI |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | GFI | IDR |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $35.38B | $573.42M |
| P/E (TTM) | 9.8x | 44.2x |
| EV/EBIT | 8.8x | 49.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 24.32% | 13.69% |
| Gross margin | 59.03% | 43.79% |
| Net margin | 40.95% | 39.22% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 20.27% | 53.54% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 44.4% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.4x | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | 4.46% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
GFI leads on
- Dividend yield4.46%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$35.38Bvs $573.42M+98%
- EV/EBIT8.8xvs 49.8x+82%
- P/E (TTM)9.8xvs 44.2x+78%
IDR leads on
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.4x+95%
- Revenue CAGR 5y53.54%vs 20.27%+62%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.