Stock comparison
Cadence Design Systems
CGI
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
GIB
CGI
Market cap
$14.55B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CDNS | GIB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 56C | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 46D | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 84A | 37D | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 78B | 39D | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 31F | CDNS |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 41D | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 80A | 43D | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CDNS | GIB |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.04B | $14.55B |
| P/E (TTM) | 80.7x | 11.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 59.1x | 7.1x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.19% | 16.2% |
| Gross margin | 88.85% | 20.49% |
| Net margin | 21.18% | 10.26% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.38% | 7.03% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.65% | 7.88% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 0.4x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.73% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CDNS leads on
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $14.55B+86%
- Gross margin88.85%vs 20.49%+77%
- Revenue CAGR 5y15.38%vs 7.03%+54%
- Net margin21.18%vs 10.26%+52%
GIB leads on
- Dividend yield0.73%vs 0.0%+100%
- EV/EBIT7.1xvs 59.1x+88%
- P/E (TTM)11.5xvs 80.7x+86%
- ROIC (TTM)16.2%vs 12.19%+25%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.