Stock comparison
Global Partners LP
USA Compression Partners, LP
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
GLP
Global Partners LP
Market cap
$1.75B
Sector
Energy
USAC
USA Compression Partners, LP
Market cap
$3.56B
Sector
Energy
Overall winner
USA Compression Partners, LP USAC
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | GLP | USAC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 45D | 69C | USAC |
| Benjamin Graham | 57C | 84A | USAC |
| Philip Fisher | 22F | 61C | USAC |
| Peter Lynch | 55C | 71C | USAC |
| Joel Greenblatt | 42D | 35D | GLP |
| Charlie Munger | 31F | 68D | USAC |
| Terry Smith | 34F | 64D | USAC |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | GLP | USAC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $1.75B | $3.56B |
| P/E (TTM) | 12.8x | 32.8x |
| EV/EBIT | 17.0x | 20.6x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 16.98% | 8.89% |
| Gross margin | 5.57% | 51.61% |
| Net margin | 0.67% | 11.91% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 8.8% | 12.07% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 4.44% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 2.3x | 9.5x |
| Dividend yield | 6.2% | 7.08% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
GLP leads on
- Debt / Equity2.3xvs 9.5x+76%
- P/E (TTM)12.8xvs 32.8x+61%
- ROIC (TTM)16.98%vs 8.89%+48%
- EV/EBIT17.0xvs 20.6x+18%
USAC leads on
- Net margin11.91%vs 0.67%+94%
- Gross margin51.61%vs 5.57%+89%
- Market cap$3.56Bvs $1.75B+51%
- Revenue CAGR 5y12.07%vs 8.8%+27%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.