Which is better, H or WINA?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Winmark Corporation (WINA) currently grades higher than H — 80/100 (A grade) vs 28/100 (F). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — H wins on Peter Lynch; WINA wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy H or WINA?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both H and WINA are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is H better than WINA for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, WINA currently grades higher — 80/100 vs 28/100, a 52-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between H and WINA on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). H currently scores 28/100 (F grade); WINA scores 80/100 (A grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, H or WINA?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. H and WINA are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, H or WINA?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are H and WINA both Consumer Cyclical stocks?

Yes — both Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) and Winmark Corporation (WINA) operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this H vs WINA comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Hyatt Hotels

Winmark

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Hyatt Hotels

Market cap

$16.48B

Sector

Consumer Discretionary

WINA

Winmark

Market cap

$1.29B

Sector

Consumer Discretionary

Overall winner

Winmark WINA

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	H	WINA	Winner
Warren Buffett	28F	80A	WINA
Benjamin Graham	43D	77B	WINA
Philip Fisher	44D	66B	WINA
Peter Lynch	79C	64C	H
Joel Greenblatt	40D	69B	WINA
Charlie Munger	25F	57C	WINA
Terry Smith	20F	58C	WINA

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	H	WINA
Market cap	$16.48B	$1.29B
P/E (TTM)	-	31.6x
EV/EBIT	35.0x	24.5x
ROIC (TTM)	-1.92%	2.43%
Gross margin	17.61%	96.66%
Net margin	-0.55%	48.19%
Revenue CAGR 5y	49.15%	2.42%
EPS CAGR 5y	86.28%	1.92%
Debt / Equity	1.4x	-
Dividend yield	0.36%	3.84%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

H leads on

P/E (TTM)-vs 31.6x+107%
EPS CAGR 5y86.28%vs 1.92%+98%
Revenue CAGR 5y49.15%vs 2.42%+95%
Market cap$16.48Bvs $1.29B+92%

WINA leads on

Debt / Equity-vs 1.4x+196%
Net margin48.19%vs -0.55%+101%
ROIC (TTM)2.43%vs -1.92%+101%
Dividend yield3.84%vs 0.36%+91%

More like H

H vs GAW.L H vs BKNG H vs RACE H vs 3092.T H vs ATAT H vs 9983.T

More like WINA

WINA vs GAW.L WINA vs BKNG WINA vs RACE WINA vs 3092.T WINA vs ATAT WINA vs 9983.T

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for H Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for WINA

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Hyatt Hotels

Winmark

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

Hyatt Hotels

Market cap

$16.48B

Sector

Consumer Discretionary

WINA

Winmark

Market cap

$1.29B

Sector

Consumer Discretionary

Overall winner

Winmark WINA

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	H	WINA	Winner
Warren Buffett	28F	80A	WINA
Benjamin Graham	43D	77B	WINA
Philip Fisher	44D	66B	WINA
Peter Lynch	79C	64C	H
Joel Greenblatt	40D	69B	WINA
Charlie Munger	25F	57C	WINA
Terry Smith	20F	58C	WINA

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	H	WINA
Market cap	$16.48B	$1.29B
P/E (TTM)	-	31.6x
EV/EBIT	35.0x	24.5x
ROIC (TTM)	-1.92%	2.43%
Gross margin	17.61%	96.66%
Net margin	-0.55%	48.19%
Revenue CAGR 5y	49.15%	2.42%
EPS CAGR 5y	86.28%	1.92%
Debt / Equity	1.4x	-
Dividend yield	0.36%	3.84%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

H leads on

P/E (TTM)-vs 31.6x+107%
EPS CAGR 5y86.28%vs 1.92%+98%
Revenue CAGR 5y49.15%vs 2.42%+95%
Market cap$16.48Bvs $1.29B+92%

WINA leads on

Debt / Equity-vs 1.4x+196%
Net margin48.19%vs -0.55%+101%
ROIC (TTM)2.43%vs -1.92%+101%
Dividend yield3.84%vs 0.36%+91%

More like H

H vs GAW.L H vs BKNG H vs RACE H vs 3092.T H vs ATAT H vs 9983.T

More like WINA

WINA vs GAW.L WINA vs BKNG WINA vs RACE WINA vs 3092.T WINA vs ATAT WINA vs 9983.T

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for H Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for WINA

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.