Stock comparison
Cintas
Hubbell
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CTAS
Cintas
Market cap
$69.19B
Sector
Industrials
HUBB
Hubbell
Market cap
$25.1B
Sector
Industrials
Overall winner
Cintas CTAS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CTAS | HUBB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 77B | 64C | CTAS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 73B | CTAS |
| Philip Fisher | 72B | 61C | CTAS |
| Peter Lynch | 68B | 55C | CTAS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 69B | 47D | CTAS |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 60C | CTAS |
| Terry Smith | 75B | 54D | CTAS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CTAS | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $69.19B | $25.1B |
| P/E (TTM) | 34.9x | 28.2x |
| EV/EBIT | 29.7x | 22.7x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 23.17% | 13.72% |
| Gross margin | 50.36% | 35.52% |
| Net margin | 17.57% | 15.1% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 9.79% | 8.65% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 14.24% | 22.69% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.6x | 0.7x |
| Dividend yield | 1.07% | 1.14% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CTAS leads on
- Market cap$69.19Bvs $25.1B+64%
- ROIC (TTM)23.17%vs 13.72%+41%
- Gross margin50.36%vs 35.52%+29%
- Debt / Equity0.6xvs 0.7x+16%
HUBB leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y22.69%vs 14.24%+37%
- EV/EBIT22.7xvs 29.7x+24%
- P/E (TTM)28.2xvs 34.9x+19%
- Dividend yield1.14%vs 1.07%+6%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.