Stock comparison
Cintas
IES Holdings
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CTAS
Cintas
Market cap
$67.34B
Sector
Industrials
IESC
IES Holdings
Market cap
$13.65B
Sector
Industrials
Overall winner
Cintas CTAS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CTAS | IESC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 67B | 51C | CTAS |
| Benjamin Graham | 74B | 70B | CTAS |
| Philip Fisher | 62C | 57C | CTAS |
| Peter Lynch | 58C | 53C | CTAS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 59C | 64C | IESC |
| Charlie Munger | 70B | 51C | CTAS |
| Terry Smith | 65B | 48D | CTAS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CTAS | IESC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $67.34B | $13.65B |
| P/E (TTM) | 34.9x | 35.9x |
| EV/EBIT | 29.7x | 35.7x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 23.17% | 27.3% |
| Gross margin | 50.36% | 25.63% |
| Net margin | 17.57% | 10.47% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 9.79% | 21.71% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 14.24% | 47.56% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.6x | 0.1x |
| Dividend yield | 1.07% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CTAS leads on
- Dividend yield1.07%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$67.34Bvs $13.65B+80%
- Gross margin50.36%vs 25.63%+49%
- Net margin17.57%vs 10.47%+40%
IESC leads on
- Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.6x+84%
- EPS CAGR 5y47.56%vs 14.24%+70%
- Revenue CAGR 5y21.71%vs 9.79%+55%
- ROIC (TTM)27.3%vs 23.17%+15%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.