Stock comparison
Lamar Advertising
Phillips Edison &
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
LAMR
Lamar Advertising
Market cap
$15.54B
Sector
Real Estate
PECO
Phillips Edison &
Market cap
$5.08B
Sector
Real Estate
Overall winner
Lamar Advertising LAMR
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | LAMR | PECO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 58C | 64D | PECO |
| Benjamin Graham | 76B | 64C | LAMR |
| Philip Fisher | 54C | 77C | PECO |
| Peter Lynch | 66C | 51C | LAMR |
| Joel Greenblatt | 50D | 43D | LAMR |
| Charlie Munger | 58D | 61D | PECO |
| Terry Smith | 55D | 56D | PECO |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | LAMR | PECO |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $15.54B | $5.08B |
| P/E (TTM) | 28.1x | 43.1x |
| EV/EBIT | 29.5x | 38.3x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 9.09% | 5.33% |
| Gross margin | 31.54% | 53.41% |
| Net margin | 24.02% | 15.58% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 6.11% | 8.27% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 10.84% | 56.51% |
| Debt / Equity | 5.3x | 1.1x |
| Dividend yield | 4.27% | 3.22% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
LAMR leads on
- Market cap$15.54Bvs $5.08B+67%
- ROIC (TTM)9.09%vs 5.33%+41%
- Net margin24.02%vs 15.58%+35%
- P/E (TTM)28.1xvs 43.1x+35%
PECO leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y56.51%vs 10.84%+81%
- Debt / Equity1.1xvs 5.3x+79%
- Gross margin53.41%vs 31.54%+41%
- Revenue CAGR 5y8.27%vs 6.11%+26%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.