Stock comparison
Cadence Design Systems
Lattice Semiconductor
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor
Market cap
$19.62B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CDNS | LSCC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 34F | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 76B | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 84A | 32F | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 78B | 8F | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 2F | CDNS |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 38D | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 80A | 38D | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CDNS | LSCC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.04B | $19.62B |
| P/E (TTM) | 80.7x | 887.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 59.1x | 1150.1x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.19% | 2.46% |
| Gross margin | 88.85% | 66.89% |
| Net margin | 21.18% | 3.46% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.38% | 0.38% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.65% | -57.66% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 0.1x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CDNS leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y12.65%vs -57.66%+122%
- Revenue CAGR 5y15.38%vs 0.38%+98%
- EV/EBIT59.1xvs 1150.1x+95%
- P/E (TTM)80.7xvs 887.5x+91%
LSCC leads on
- Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.5x+89%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.