Stock comparison
Cintas
Intuitive Machines
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CTAS
Cintas
Market cap
$69.19B
Sector
Industrials
LUNR
Intuitive Machines
Market cap
$6.1B
Sector
Industrials
Overall winner
Cintas CTAS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CTAS | LUNR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 77B | 34F | CTAS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 45D | CTAS |
| Philip Fisher | 72B | 52C | CTAS |
| Peter Lynch | 68B | 62C | CTAS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 69B | 2F | CTAS |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 50D | CTAS |
| Terry Smith | 75B | 46D | CTAS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CTAS | LUNR |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $69.19B | $6.1B |
| P/E (TTM) | 34.9x | - |
| EV/EBIT | 29.7x | - |
| ROIC (TTM) | 23.17% | -13.57% |
| Gross margin | 50.36% | 12.4% |
| Net margin | 17.57% | -46.11% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 9.79% | 30.44% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 14.24% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.6x | - |
| Dividend yield | 1.07% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CTAS leads on
- ROIC (TTM)23.17%vs -13.57%+159%
- Net margin17.57%vs -46.11%+138%
- Dividend yield1.07%vs 0.0%+100%
- Market cap$69.19Bvs $6.1B+91%
LUNR leads on
- P/E (TTM)-vs 34.9x+188%
- Debt / Equity-vs 0.6x+182%
- EV/EBIT-vs 29.7x+153%
- Revenue CAGR 5y30.44%vs 9.79%+68%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.