Stock comparison
Cadence Design Systems
Lyft
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
LYFT
Lyft
Market cap
$5.28B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CDNS | LYFT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 38D | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 24F | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 84A | 47D | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 78B | 68C | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 100A | LYFT |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 36D | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 80A | 31F | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CDNS | LYFT |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.04B | $5.28B |
| P/E (TTM) | 80.7x | 1.8x |
| EV/EBIT | 59.1x | - |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.19% | 2.75% |
| Gross margin | 88.85% | 43.24% |
| Net margin | 21.18% | 43.82% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.38% | 18.45% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.65% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 0.4x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CDNS leads on
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $5.28B+95%
- Gross margin88.85%vs 43.24%+51%
LYFT leads on
- EV/EBIT-vs 59.1x+146%
- P/E (TTM)1.8xvs 80.7x+98%
- ROIC (TTM)2.75%vs 12.19%+96%
- Net margin43.82%vs 21.18%+52%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.