Stock comparison
Cadence Design Systems
Magic Software Enterprises
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises
Market cap
$853.35M
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CDNS | MGIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 51C | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 62C | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 84A | 35D | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 78B | 45D | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 29F | CDNS |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 31F | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 80A | 33F | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CDNS | MGIC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.04B | $853.35M |
| P/E (TTM) | 80.7x | 21.3x |
| EV/EBIT | 59.1x | 13.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.19% | 12.82% |
| Gross margin | 88.85% | 28.04% |
| Net margin | 21.18% | 6.64% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.38% | 10.46% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.65% | 11.23% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 0.3x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 2.57% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CDNS leads on
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $853.35M+99%
- Net margin21.18%vs 6.64%+69%
- Gross margin88.85%vs 28.04%+68%
- Revenue CAGR 5y15.38%vs 10.46%+32%
MGIC leads on
- Dividend yield2.57%vs 0.0%+100%
- EV/EBIT13.8xvs 59.1x+77%
- P/E (TTM)21.3xvs 80.7x+74%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 0.5x+26%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.