Stock comparison
Cadence Design Systems
Mitek Systems
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
MITK
Mitek Systems
Market cap
$723.9M
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CDNS | MITK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 50D | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 77B | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 84A | 41D | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 78B | 51C | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 47D | CDNS |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 37D | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 80A | 37D | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CDNS | MITK |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.04B | $723.9M |
| P/E (TTM) | 80.7x | 38.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 59.1x | 37.1x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.19% | 6.43% |
| Gross margin | 88.85% | 88.0% |
| Net margin | 21.18% | 8.74% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.38% | 10.67% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.65% | 1.36% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 0.2x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CDNS leads on
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $723.9M+99%
- EPS CAGR 5y12.65%vs 1.36%+89%
- Net margin21.18%vs 8.74%+59%
- ROIC (TTM)12.19%vs 6.43%+47%
MITK leads on
- Debt / Equity0.2xvs 0.5x+53%
- P/E (TTM)38.5xvs 80.7x+52%
- EV/EBIT37.1xvs 59.1x+37%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.