Stock comparison
Black Stone Minerals, L.P.
Mach Natural Resources LP
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
BSM
Black Stone Minerals, L.P.
Market cap
$2.84B
Sector
Energy
MNR
Mach Natural Resources LP
Market cap
$2.36B
Sector
Energy
Overall winner
Black Stone Minerals, L.P. BSM
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | BSM | MNR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 66B | 57C | BSM |
| Benjamin Graham | 54C | 34F | BSM |
| Philip Fisher | 58C | 49D | BSM |
| Peter Lynch | 27F | 40D | MNR |
| Joel Greenblatt | 45D | 25F | BSM |
| Charlie Munger | 73B | 54C | BSM |
| Terry Smith | 74B | 47D | BSM |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | BSM | MNR |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $2.84B | $2.36B |
| P/E (TTM) | 9.6x | 10.1x |
| EV/EBIT | 11.6x | 10.3x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 27.66% | 8.53% |
| Gross margin | 78.01% | 36.88% |
| Net margin | 63.48% | 17.65% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | -4.41% | 31.55% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 13.55% | -7.05% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.2x | 0.6x |
| Dividend yield | 8.97% | 14.03% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
BSM leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y13.55%vs -7.05%+152%
- Net margin63.48%vs 17.65%+72%
- Debt / Equity0.2xvs 0.6x+72%
- ROIC (TTM)27.66%vs 8.53%+69%
MNR leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y31.55%vs -4.41%+114%
- Dividend yield14.03%vs 8.97%+36%
- EV/EBIT10.3xvs 11.6x+11%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.