Stock comparison
MSCI
MGIC Investment
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
MSCI
MSCI
Market cap
$42.85B
Sector
Financials
MTG
MGIC Investment
Market cap
$5.5B
Sector
Financials
Overall winner
MSCI MSCI
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | MSCI | MTG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 80A | 71B | MSCI |
| Benjamin Graham | 71B | 52C | MSCI |
| Philip Fisher | 82A | 61C | MSCI |
| Peter Lynch | 70B | 35D | MSCI |
| Joel Greenblatt | 80A | 36D | MSCI |
| Charlie Munger | 87C | 58C | MSCI |
| Terry Smith | 88C | 63D | MSCI |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | MSCI | MTG |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $42.85B | $5.5B |
| P/E (TTM) | 31.2x | 7.8x |
| EV/EBIT | 27.5x | 6.3x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 38.53% | 12.43% |
| Gross margin | 82.86% | 93.58% |
| Net margin | 40.74% | 59.63% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 11.29% | 0.59% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 15.35% | 13.65% |
| Debt / Equity | - | 0.1x |
| Dividend yield | 1.37% | 2.32% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
MSCI leads on
- Debt / Equity-vs 0.1x+105%
- Revenue CAGR 5y11.29%vs 0.59%+95%
- Market cap$42.85Bvs $5.5B+87%
- ROIC (TTM)38.53%vs 12.43%+68%
MTG leads on
- EV/EBIT6.3xvs 27.5x+77%
- P/E (TTM)7.8xvs 31.2x+75%
- Dividend yield2.32%vs 1.37%+41%
- Net margin59.63%vs 40.74%+32%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.