Stock comparison
Cadence Design Systems
Navan
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
NAVN
Navan
Market cap
$4.68B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CDNS | NAVN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 29F | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 72D | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 84A | 41D | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 78B | 71B | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 0F | CDNS |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 27F | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 80A | 25F | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CDNS | NAVN |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.04B | $4.68B |
| P/E (TTM) | 80.7x | - |
| EV/EBIT | 59.1x | - |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.19% | -6.79% |
| Gross margin | 88.85% | 69.86% |
| Net margin | 21.18% | -31.76% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.38% | 33.46% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.65% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 7.7x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CDNS leads on
- Net margin21.18%vs -31.76%+167%
- ROIC (TTM)12.19%vs -6.79%+156%
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $4.68B+95%
- Debt / Equity0.5xvs 7.7x+94%
NAVN leads on
- EV/EBIT-vs 59.1x+175%
- P/E (TTM)-vs 80.7x+139%
- Revenue CAGR 5y33.46%vs 15.38%+54%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.