Stock comparison
Cadence Design Systems
Paymentus Holdings
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
PAY
Paymentus Holdings
Market cap
$2.94B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CDNS | PAY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 41D | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 68D | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 84A | 61C | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 78B | 53C | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 50C | CDNS |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 38D | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 80A | 43D | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CDNS | PAY |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.04B | $2.94B |
| P/E (TTM) | 80.7x | 45.3x |
| EV/EBIT | 59.1x | 39.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.19% | 11.15% |
| Gross margin | 88.85% | 24.74% |
| Net margin | 21.18% | 5.79% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.38% | 31.88% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.65% | 72.4% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CDNS leads on
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $2.94B+97%
- Net margin21.18%vs 5.79%+73%
- Gross margin88.85%vs 24.74%+72%
- ROIC (TTM)12.19%vs 11.15%+9%
PAY leads on
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.5x+98%
- EPS CAGR 5y72.4%vs 12.65%+83%
- Revenue CAGR 5y31.88%vs 15.38%+52%
- P/E (TTM)45.3xvs 80.7x+44%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.