Stock comparison
Cadence Design Systems
PagerDuty
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
PD
PagerDuty
Market cap
$656.73M
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CDNS | PD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 54D | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 45D | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 84A | 49D | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 78B | 74B | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 64D | PD |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 47D | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 80A | 44D | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CDNS | PD |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.04B | $656.73M |
| P/E (TTM) | 80.7x | 3.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 59.1x | 129.3x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.19% | 0.84% |
| Gross margin | 88.85% | 84.95% |
| Net margin | 21.18% | 35.3% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.38% | 15.02% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.65% | - |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 1.6x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CDNS leads on
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $656.73M+99%
- ROIC (TTM)12.19%vs 0.84%+93%
- Debt / Equity0.5xvs 1.6x+71%
- EV/EBIT59.1xvs 129.3x+54%
PD leads on
- P/E (TTM)3.5xvs 80.7x+96%
- Net margin35.3%vs 21.18%+40%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.