Stock comparison
Restaurant Brands International
Yum! Brands
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
QSR
Restaurant Brands International
Market cap
$26.15B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
YUM
Yum! Brands
Market cap
$42.76B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
Overall winner
Yum! Brands YUM
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | QSR | YUM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 60C | 71B | YUM |
| Benjamin Graham | 79B | 59C | QSR |
| Philip Fisher | 48D | 57C | YUM |
| Peter Lynch | 41D | 63C | YUM |
| Joel Greenblatt | 33F | 63C | YUM |
| Charlie Munger | 57D | 76C | YUM |
| Terry Smith | 54D | 73C | YUM |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | QSR | YUM |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $26.15B | $42.76B |
| P/E (TTM) | 27.6x | 24.2x |
| EV/EBIT | 18.3x | 21.0x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 8.03% | 31.39% |
| Gross margin | 44.8% | 45.67% |
| Net margin | 9.96% | 20.48% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 13.23% | 5.69% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | -3.4% | 1.34% |
| Debt / Equity | 4.2x | - |
| Dividend yield | 3.31% | 1.89% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
QSR leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y13.23%vs 5.69%+57%
- Dividend yield3.31%vs 1.89%+43%
- EV/EBIT18.3xvs 21.0x+13%
YUM leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y1.34%vs -3.4%+139%
- Debt / Equity-vs 4.2x+139%
- ROIC (TTM)31.39%vs 8.03%+74%
- Net margin20.48%vs 9.96%+51%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.