Which is better, GFI or SA?

On the Buffett-Fit framework, Gold Fields Limited (GFI) currently grades higher than SA — 72/100 (B grade) vs 24/100 (F). That said, "better" depends on which framework you trust — GFI wins on Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, Joel Greenblatt, Charlie Munger, and Terry Smith; SA wins on none. The full pillar breakdown is on this page.

Should I buy GFI or SA?

This page is an educational comparison, not investment advice. Both GFI and SA are graded against the same Buffett 5-pillar framework (moat, earnings durability, management quality, financial health, valuation) plus six other documented investor frameworks. Read the side-by-side breakdown to see which one matches the criteria you care about most — and always do your own research before making any investment decision.

Is GFI better than SA for value investing?

On the Buffett-style value-investing framework, GFI currently grades higher — 72/100 vs 24/100, a 48-point gap. The gap is driven by which pillars each stock passes; the table on this page shows moat, durability, management, financial health, and valuation side-by-side.

What's the difference between GFI and SA on Warren Buffett's framework?

Both stocks are evaluated on the same five pillars: economic moat (durable competitive advantage), earnings durability (consistent profitability), management quality (capital allocation), financial health (conservative balance sheet), and valuation (margin of safety). GFI currently scores 72/100 (B grade); SA scores 24/100 (F grade). The "Where each wins" section on this page breaks down which pillar each stock dominates.

Which has the stronger moat, GFI or SA?

Moat strength is one of the five pillars in the Buffett-Fit score on this page. GFI and SA are each scored on ROIC sustainability, gross-margin durability, and qualitative signals like brand strength, switching costs, network effects, and regulatory barriers. The pillar breakdown on this page shows the moat sub-score side-by-side so you can see which one has the more durable competitive advantage.

Which is more undervalued, GFI or SA?

Valuation is one of the five Buffett-Fit pillars on this page. Both stocks are scored on owner-earnings yield, price-to-intrinsic-value vs the underlying compounding rate, and the margin of safety relative to a conservative DCF. The valuation sub-score in the table below tells you which one currently trades at a more attractive price relative to its underlying business quality.

Are GFI and SA both Basic Materials stocks?

Yes — both Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Seabridge Gold Inc. (SA) operate in the Basic Materials sector. That makes this a direct sector-peer comparison, which is the apples-to-apples way to use the Buffett-Fit framework: the score weighs each stock against its sector's specific quality and valuation benchmarks (sector-relative bonus), so the cross-stock comparison isn't distorted by inter-sector base-rate differences.

Is this GFI vs SA comparison investment advice?

No. This page is an educational pattern-match against documented public frameworks (Buffett, Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Greenblatt, Munger, Smith), not personalised investment advice. The scores reflect how closely each stock matches each framework's documented criteria — they are not buy/hold/sell recommendations. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial adviser for personalised advice.

Stock comparison

Gold Fields Limited

Seabridge Gold

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

GFI

Gold Fields Limited

Market cap

$35.38B

Sector

Materials

Seabridge Gold

Market cap

$3.21B

Sector

Materials

Overall winner

Gold Fields Limited GFI

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	GFI	SA	Winner
Warren Buffett	72B	24F	GFI
Benjamin Graham	65B	56D	GFI
Philip Fisher	78B	38D	GFI
Peter Lynch	64C	18F	GFI
Joel Greenblatt	47D	0F	GFI
Charlie Munger	72B	29F	GFI
Terry Smith	71B	37D	GFI

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	GFI	SA
Market cap	$35.38B	$3.21B
P/E (TTM)	9.8x	-
EV/EBIT	8.8x	-
ROIC (TTM)	24.32%	-1.08%
Gross margin	59.03%	0.0%
Net margin	40.95%	0.0%
Revenue CAGR 5y	20.27%	-
EPS CAGR 5y	44.4%	-
Debt / Equity	0.4x	0.5x
Dividend yield	4.46%	0.0%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

GFI leads on

ROIC (TTM)24.32%vs -1.08%+104%
Gross margin59.03%vs 0.0%+100%
Net margin40.95%vs 0.0%+100%
Dividend yield4.46%vs 0.0%+100%

SA leads on

P/E (TTM)-vs 9.8x+116%
EV/EBIT-vs 8.8x+104%

More like GFI

GFI vs SCCO GFI vs FRES.L GFI vs RGLD GFI vs BHP GFI vs ASIANPAINT.NS GFI vs FNV

More like SA

SA vs SCCO SA vs FRES.L SA vs RGLD SA vs BHP SA vs ASIANPAINT.NS SA vs FNV

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GFI Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for SA

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.

Stock comparison

Gold Fields Limited

Seabridge Gold

Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.

GFI

Gold Fields Limited

Market cap

$35.38B

Sector

Materials

Seabridge Gold

Market cap

$3.21B

Sector

Materials

Overall winner

Gold Fields Limited GFI

Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.

Fit scores by strategy

Strategy	GFI	SA	Winner
Warren Buffett	72B	24F	GFI
Benjamin Graham	65B	56D	GFI
Philip Fisher	78B	38D	GFI
Peter Lynch	64C	18F	GFI
Joel Greenblatt	47D	0F	GFI
Charlie Munger	72B	29F	GFI
Terry Smith	71B	37D	GFI

Side-by-side metrics

Metric	GFI	SA
Market cap	$35.38B	$3.21B
P/E (TTM)	9.8x	-
EV/EBIT	8.8x	-
ROIC (TTM)	24.32%	-1.08%
Gross margin	59.03%	0.0%
Net margin	40.95%	0.0%
Revenue CAGR 5y	20.27%	-
EPS CAGR 5y	44.4%	-
Debt / Equity	0.4x	0.5x
Dividend yield	4.46%	0.0%

Where each one wins

The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.

GFI leads on

ROIC (TTM)24.32%vs -1.08%+104%
Gross margin59.03%vs 0.0%+100%
Net margin40.95%vs 0.0%+100%
Dividend yield4.46%vs 0.0%+100%

SA leads on

P/E (TTM)-vs 9.8x+116%
EV/EBIT-vs 8.8x+104%

More like GFI

GFI vs SCCO GFI vs FRES.L GFI vs RGLD GFI vs BHP GFI vs ASIANPAINT.NS GFI vs FNV

More like SA

SA vs SCCO SA vs FRES.L SA vs RGLD SA vs BHP SA vs ASIANPAINT.NS SA vs FNV

Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for GFI Read the full Buffett-Brain analysis for SA

Related on invest-like

Strongest Moat Highest ROIC Warren Buffett strategy Economic Moat

Key terms in this analysis

ROIC Free Cash Flow (FCF)Economic Moat P/E Ratio Margin of Safety Quality Score

Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.