Stock comparison
Sonic Automotive
Winmark
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
SAH
Sonic Automotive
Market cap
$2.65B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
WINA
Winmark
Market cap
$1.31B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
Overall winner
Winmark WINA
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | SAH | WINA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 36D | 80A | WINA |
| Benjamin Graham | 67C | 77B | WINA |
| Philip Fisher | 13F | 66B | WINA |
| Peter Lynch | 24F | 64C | WINA |
| Joel Greenblatt | 20F | 69B | WINA |
| Charlie Munger | 23F | 57C | WINA |
| Terry Smith | 22F | 58C | WINA |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | SAH | WINA |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $2.65B | $1.31B |
| P/E (TTM) | 22.9x | 31.6x |
| EV/EBIT | 12.8x | 24.5x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 6.49% | 2.43% |
| Gross margin | 14.83% | 96.66% |
| Net margin | 0.72% | 48.19% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.15% | 2.42% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | -19.79% | 1.92% |
| Debt / Equity | 4.5x | - |
| Dividend yield | 2.01% | 3.84% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
SAH leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y5.15%vs 2.42%+53%
- Market cap$2.65Bvs $1.31B+51%
- EV/EBIT12.8xvs 24.5x+48%
- P/E (TTM)22.9xvs 31.6x+28%
WINA leads on
- Debt / Equity-vs 4.5x+130%
- EPS CAGR 5y1.92%vs -19.79%+110%
- Net margin48.19%vs 0.72%+99%
- ROIC (TTM)2.43%vs 6.49%+97%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.