Stock comparison
Sally Beauty Holdings
Winmark
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
SBH
Sally Beauty Holdings
Market cap
$1.2B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
WINA
Winmark
Market cap
$1.31B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
Overall winner
Winmark WINA
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | SBH | WINA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 40D | 80A | WINA |
| Benjamin Graham | 44D | 77B | WINA |
| Philip Fisher | 22F | 66B | WINA |
| Peter Lynch | 9F | 64C | WINA |
| Joel Greenblatt | 23F | 69B | WINA |
| Charlie Munger | 32F | 57C | WINA |
| Terry Smith | 32F | 58C | WINA |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | SBH | WINA |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $1.2B | $1.31B |
| P/E (TTM) | 6.9x | 31.6x |
| EV/EBIT | 5.0x | 24.5x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 9.28% | 2.43% |
| Gross margin | 51.9% | 96.66% |
| Net margin | 4.93% | 48.19% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | -1.14% | 2.42% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | -2.18% | 1.92% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.6x | - |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 3.84% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
SBH leads on
- EV/EBIT5.0xvs 24.5x+79%
- P/E (TTM)6.9xvs 31.6x+78%
WINA leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y1.92%vs -2.18%+188%
- Debt / Equity-vs 0.6x+147%
- Revenue CAGR 5y2.42%vs -1.14%+147%
- Dividend yield3.84%vs 0.0%+100%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.