Stock comparison
Monster Beverage
Constellation Brands
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
MNST
Monster Beverage
Market cap
$84.88B
Sector
Consumer Staples
STZ
Constellation Brands
Market cap
$25.74B
Sector
Consumer Staples
Overall winner
Monster Beverage MNST
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | MNST | STZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 73B | 46D | MNST |
| Benjamin Graham | 91A | 48D | MNST |
| Philip Fisher | 73B | 43D | MNST |
| Peter Lynch | 72B | 46D | MNST |
| Joel Greenblatt | 68C | 30F | MNST |
| Charlie Munger | 78B | 50D | MNST |
| Terry Smith | 76B | 45D | MNST |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | MNST | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $84.88B | $25.74B |
| P/E (TTM) | 41.9x | 15.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 34.4x | 13.0x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.87% | 10.48% |
| Gross margin | 55.47% | 51.67% |
| Net margin | 23.11% | 18.46% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 10.61% | 0.89% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 10.67% | - |
| Debt / Equity | - | 1.4x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 2.71% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
MNST leads on
- Debt / Equity-vs 1.4x+100%
- Revenue CAGR 5y10.61%vs 0.89%+92%
- Market cap$84.88Bvs $25.74B+70%
- ROIC (TTM)21.87%vs 10.48%+52%
STZ leads on
- Dividend yield2.71%vs 0.0%+100%
- P/E (TTM)15.5xvs 41.9x+63%
- EV/EBIT13.0xvs 34.4x+62%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.