Stock comparison
Cintas
Thomson Reuters
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CTAS
Cintas
Market cap
$69.19B
Sector
Industrials
TRI
Thomson Reuters
Market cap
$37.48B
Sector
Industrials
Overall winner
Cintas CTAS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CTAS | TRI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 77B | 63C | CTAS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 66B | CTAS |
| Philip Fisher | 72B | 54C | CTAS |
| Peter Lynch | 68B | 31F | CTAS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 69B | 43D | CTAS |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 60C | CTAS |
| Terry Smith | 75B | 60C | CTAS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CTAS | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $69.19B | $37.48B |
| P/E (TTM) | 34.9x | 23.6x |
| EV/EBIT | 29.7x | 19.1x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 23.17% | 10.95% |
| Gross margin | 50.36% | 72.4% |
| Net margin | 17.57% | 19.91% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 9.79% | 4.63% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 14.24% | -26.14% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.6x | 0.2x |
| Dividend yield | 1.07% | 3.99% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CTAS leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y14.24%vs -26.14%+154%
- Revenue CAGR 5y9.79%vs 4.63%+53%
- ROIC (TTM)23.17%vs 10.95%+53%
- Market cap$69.19Bvs $37.48B+46%
TRI leads on
- Dividend yield3.99%vs 1.07%+73%
- Debt / Equity0.2xvs 0.6x+66%
- EV/EBIT19.1xvs 29.7x+36%
- P/E (TTM)23.6xvs 34.9x+32%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.