Stock comparison
Texas Pacific Land
Cactus
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
TPL
Texas Pacific Land
Market cap
$27.73B
Sector
Energy
WHD
Cactus
Market cap
$4.32B
Sector
Energy
Overall winner
Texas Pacific Land TPL
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | TPL | WHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 81A | 65C | TPL |
| Benjamin Graham | 91A | 83A | TPL |
| Philip Fisher | 89A | 75C | TPL |
| Peter Lynch | 80A | 77C | TPL |
| Joel Greenblatt | 75C | 27F | TPL |
| Charlie Munger | 92A | 58C | TPL |
| Terry Smith | 97A | 60C | TPL |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | TPL | WHD |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $27.73B | $4.32B |
| P/E (TTM) | 54.4x | 56.9x |
| EV/EBIT | 45.8x | 15.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 29.83% | 8.97% |
| Gross margin | 97.7% | 56.14% |
| Net margin | 60.03% | 6.17% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.34% | 25.24% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 15.89% | 18.68% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.0x | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.91% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
TPL leads on
- Net margin60.03%vs 6.17%+90%
- Market cap$27.73Bvs $4.32B+84%
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.0x+78%
- ROIC (TTM)29.83%vs 8.97%+70%
WHD leads on
- EV/EBIT15.8xvs 45.8x+66%
- Revenue CAGR 5y25.24%vs 15.34%+39%
- Dividend yield0.91%vs 0.55%+39%
- EPS CAGR 5y18.68%vs 15.89%+15%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.