Stock comparison
Booking Holdings
Yum China Holdings
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
BKNG
Booking Holdings
Market cap
$124.8B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
YUMC
Yum China Holdings
Market cap
$15.64B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
Overall winner
Booking Holdings BKNG
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | BKNG | YUMC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 31F | BKNG |
| Benjamin Graham | 59C | 57C | BKNG |
| Philip Fisher | 83A | 20F | BKNG |
| Peter Lynch | 71B | 48D | BKNG |
| Joel Greenblatt | 70B | 28F | BKNG |
| Charlie Munger | 72B | 22F | BKNG |
| Terry Smith | 81A | 21F | BKNG |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | BKNG | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $124.8B | $15.64B |
| P/E (TTM) | 19.8x | 17.7x |
| EV/EBIT | 13.2x | 12.4x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 68.24% | 12.18% |
| Gross margin | 100.0% | 17.23% |
| Net margin | 22.23% | 7.83% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 25.19% | 4.6% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 55.62% | 1.86% |
| Debt / Equity | - | 0.3x |
| Dividend yield | 1.02% | 2.13% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
BKNG leads on
- Debt / Equity-vs 0.3x+116%
- EPS CAGR 5y55.62%vs 1.86%+97%
- Market cap$124.8Bvs $15.64B+87%
- Gross margin100.0%vs 17.23%+83%
YUMC leads on
- Dividend yield2.13%vs 1.02%+52%
- P/E (TTM)17.7xvs 19.8x+11%
- EV/EBIT12.4xvs 13.2x+6%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.