Stock comparison
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited
Yum China Holdings
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
ATAT
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited
Market cap
$4.68B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
YUMC
Yum China Holdings
Market cap
$15.64B
Sector
Consumer Discretionary
Overall winner
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited ATAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | ATAT | YUMC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 72B | 31F | ATAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 71B | 57C | ATAT |
| Philip Fisher | 73B | 20F | ATAT |
| Peter Lynch | 63C | 48D | ATAT |
| Joel Greenblatt | 53C | 28F | ATAT |
| Charlie Munger | 73B | 22F | ATAT |
| Terry Smith | 75B | 21F | ATAT |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ATAT | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $4.68B | $15.64B |
| P/E (TTM) | 19.5x | 17.7x |
| EV/EBIT | 16.4x | 12.4x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 27.61% | 12.18% |
| Gross margin | 43.51% | 17.23% |
| Net margin | 17.23% | 7.83% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 45.59% | 4.6% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 89.18% | 1.86% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.4x | 0.3x |
| Dividend yield | 2.04% | 2.13% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
ATAT leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y89.18%vs 1.86%+98%
- Revenue CAGR 5y45.59%vs 4.6%+90%
- Gross margin43.51%vs 17.23%+60%
- ROIC (TTM)27.61%vs 12.18%+56%
YUMC leads on
- Market cap$15.64Bvs $4.68B+70%
- EV/EBIT12.4xvs 16.4x+24%
- P/E (TTM)17.7xvs 19.5x+9%
- Debt / Equity0.3xvs 0.4x+7%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.