Stock comparison
Black Stone Minerals, L.P.
Cactus
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
BSM
Black Stone Minerals, L.P.
Market cap
$2.95B
Sector
Energy
WHD
Cactus
Market cap
$4.32B
Sector
Energy
Overall winner
Black Stone Minerals, L.P. BSM
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | BSM | WHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 76B | 65C | BSM |
| Benjamin Graham | 64C | 83A | WHD |
| Philip Fisher | 68D | 75C | WHD |
| Peter Lynch | 37D | 77C | WHD |
| Joel Greenblatt | 55C | 27F | BSM |
| Charlie Munger | 83A | 58C | BSM |
| Terry Smith | 84C | 60C | BSM |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | BSM | WHD |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $2.95B | $4.32B |
| P/E (TTM) | 9.6x | 56.9x |
| EV/EBIT | 11.6x | 15.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 27.66% | 8.97% |
| Gross margin | 78.01% | 56.14% |
| Net margin | 63.48% | 6.17% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | -4.41% | 25.24% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 13.55% | 18.68% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.2x | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | 8.97% | 0.91% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
BSM leads on
- Net margin63.48%vs 6.17%+90%
- Dividend yield8.97%vs 0.91%+90%
- P/E (TTM)9.6xvs 56.9x+83%
- ROIC (TTM)27.66%vs 8.97%+68%
WHD leads on
- Revenue CAGR 5y25.24%vs -4.41%+117%
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.2x+73%
- Market cap$4.32Bvs $2.95B+32%
- EPS CAGR 5y18.68%vs 13.55%+27%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.