Stock comparison
Cadence Design Systems
Dynatrace
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
DT
Dynatrace
Market cap
$12.01B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CDNS | DT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 78B | 40D | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 73B | CDNS |
| Philip Fisher | 84A | 71C | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 78B | 75B | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 58C | 44D | CDNS |
| Charlie Munger | 80A | 38D | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 80A | 41D | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CDNS | DT |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $103.04B | $12.01B |
| P/E (TTM) | 80.7x | 71.9x |
| EV/EBIT | 59.1x | 40.9x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 12.19% | 4.99% |
| Gross margin | 88.85% | 81.56% |
| Net margin | 21.18% | 8.06% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 15.38% | 21.39% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 12.65% | 31.61% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.5x | 0.1x |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CDNS leads on
- Market cap$103.04Bvs $12.01B+88%
- Net margin21.18%vs 8.06%+62%
- ROIC (TTM)12.19%vs 4.99%+59%
- Gross margin88.85%vs 81.56%+8%
DT leads on
- Debt / Equity0.1xvs 0.5x+87%
- EPS CAGR 5y31.61%vs 12.65%+60%
- EV/EBIT40.9xvs 59.1x+31%
- Revenue CAGR 5y21.39%vs 15.38%+28%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.