Stock comparison
Celanese
Gold Fields Limited
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CE
Celanese
Market cap
$5.75B
Sector
Materials
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
Market cap
$35.38B
Sector
Materials
Overall winner
Gold Fields Limited GFI
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CE | GFI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 33F | 72B | GFI |
| Benjamin Graham | 41D | 65B | GFI |
| Philip Fisher | 19F | 78B | GFI |
| Peter Lynch | 33F | 64C | GFI |
| Joel Greenblatt | 28F | 47D | GFI |
| Charlie Munger | 25F | 72B | GFI |
| Terry Smith | 15F | 71B | GFI |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CE | GFI |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $5.75B | $35.38B |
| P/E (TTM) | - | 9.8x |
| EV/EBIT | 22.2x | 8.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | -3.56% | 24.32% |
| Gross margin | 19.83% | 59.03% |
| Net margin | -11.54% | 40.95% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 2.83% | 20.27% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | - | 44.4% |
| Debt / Equity | 3.1x | 0.4x |
| Dividend yield | 0.21% | 4.46% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CE leads on
- P/E (TTM)-vs 9.8x+158%
GFI leads on
- Net margin40.95%vs -11.54%+128%
- ROIC (TTM)24.32%vs -3.56%+115%
- Dividend yield4.46%vs 0.21%+95%
- Debt / Equity0.4xvs 3.1x+86%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.