Stock comparison
Celanese
Royal Gold
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
CE
Celanese
Market cap
$5.75B
Sector
Materials
RGLD
Royal Gold
Market cap
$15.29B
Sector
Materials
Overall winner
Royal Gold RGLD
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | CE | RGLD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 33F | 73B | RGLD |
| Benjamin Graham | 41D | 80A | RGLD |
| Philip Fisher | 19F | 69C | RGLD |
| Peter Lynch | 33F | 66B | RGLD |
| Joel Greenblatt | 28F | 46D | RGLD |
| Charlie Munger | 25F | 57D | RGLD |
| Terry Smith | 15F | 62D | RGLD |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CE | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $5.75B | $15.29B |
| P/E (TTM) | - | 32.8x |
| EV/EBIT | 22.2x | 26.2x |
| ROIC (TTM) | -3.56% | 7.56% |
| Gross margin | 19.83% | 68.47% |
| Net margin | -11.54% | 48.53% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 2.83% | 12.42% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | - | 12.65% |
| Debt / Equity | 3.1x | 0.1x |
| Dividend yield | 0.21% | 0.75% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
CE leads on
- P/E (TTM)-vs 32.8x+117%
- EV/EBIT22.2xvs 26.2x+15%
RGLD leads on
- ROIC (TTM)7.56%vs -3.56%+147%
- Net margin48.53%vs -11.54%+124%
- Debt / Equity0.1xvs 3.1x+97%
- Revenue CAGR 5y12.42%vs 2.83%+77%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.