Stock comparison
Diamondback Energy
Texas Pacific Land
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
FANG
Diamondback Energy
Market cap
$56.46B
Sector
Energy
TPL
Texas Pacific Land
Market cap
$27.73B
Sector
Energy
Overall winner
Texas Pacific Land TPL
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | FANG | TPL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 57C | 81A | TPL |
| Benjamin Graham | 53C | 91A | TPL |
| Philip Fisher | 57C | 89A | TPL |
| Peter Lynch | 27F | 80A | TPL |
| Joel Greenblatt | 16F | 75C | TPL |
| Charlie Munger | 47D | 92A | TPL |
| Terry Smith | 40D | 97A | TPL |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | FANG | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $56.46B | $27.73B |
| P/E (TTM) | 140.5x | 54.4x |
| EV/EBIT | 14.2x | 45.8x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 5.09% | 29.83% |
| Gross margin | 41.83% | 97.7% |
| Net margin | 2.65% | 60.03% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 22.16% | 15.34% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | -17.47% | 15.89% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.4x | 0.0x |
| Dividend yield | 2.07% | 0.55% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
FANG leads on
- Dividend yield2.07%vs 0.55%+73%
- EV/EBIT14.2xvs 45.8x+69%
- Market cap$56.46Bvs $27.73B+51%
- Revenue CAGR 5y22.16%vs 15.34%+31%
TPL leads on
- EPS CAGR 5y15.89%vs -17.47%+191%
- Debt / Equity0.0xvs 0.4x+97%
- Net margin60.03%vs 2.65%+96%
- ROIC (TTM)29.83%vs 5.09%+83%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.